Thats a good point I never thought of...because it talks about the beginning of time...?Why doesn't the bible talk about dinosaurs?
Thats a good point I never thought of...because it talks about the beginning of time...?Why doesn't the bible talk about dinosaurs?
Thank you all for convincing me to leave this forum. This is my last post here and can't believe there is a discussion like this open to all the forum members. Goodbye. Glad to go.
Thank you all for convincing me to leave this forum. This is my last post here and can't believe there is a discussion like this open to all the forum members. Goodbye. Glad to go.
Spunky I will admit I was a little nervous for your posts as your ALWAYS one to speak your mind and stand in the bold without fear! Which isnt a bad thing at all, I think its great you stick true to your colors and not afraid to make it known! Your post makes me smile that you werre able to stand back and look at an opinion for what it was...just an opinion I actually did like your posts in this though, you brought up some amazing and very valid points. I appreciate it and your thoughts and comments! Keep em coming, you seem like one of the most educated here when ever you post up its always filled with knowledge!I read a rebuttal to one of my statements and got a little hot around the collar because I didn't feel that the argument was fair. That lasted less than a second and I had to agree that his opinion was worth as much as mine no matter what point on the compass it was from and I got over it fast.
This has been civil and non-argumentative. Points from all sides explored and not one personal attack or any bickering.
Good job Guys and Gals....:iconbeer:
I really think that this is a great thread. We've all been able to express how we feel without hard feelings. As I have said before we cannot prove or dis-prove the existance of any diety. You have to go with what you feel.
Thanks Cautious
Your uncle is not technically right.According to my Atheist Uncle who is a Nuclear Physicist, and Atheist does not believe in God or an afterlife whereas an Agnostic sits on a fence neither denying the existence of God nor accepting it.
Your uncle is not technically right.
Agnosticism is actually a creation of the Catholic Church. Catholic scholars intentionally created a "middle ground" for non-believers, as a method fo attempting to real people back in. If you look at what the words mean, there really is no such thing as an agnostic when it comes to religion. If you think there is a god, then you are not an atheist. If you are unsure, then you certainly don't believe there IS a god, and hence technically you are an atheist...you don't believe there is a god.
But by creating the "agnostic" label, the church created an atheist lite, so people would not have to be labelled as an outright atheist. It also conveniently allowed them to define atheism more radically, and hence condemn it. An atheist doesn't necessarily deny the existence of god. But an atheist chooses not to believe in a god because the existence of god is not proven. It was the church, through their creation of the agnostic label, that then defined atheists as outright "deniers" and hence much more hardline, and for the time, condemn-able.
Just so you know.
THIS.The ability to learn about anything, whether it be other religions in the world or a different type of motorcycle to buy, relies on the person to not put blinders on and have an open mind when reading a subject. It is a choice to open this thread and read it, and to choose to make or not make a comment. The thread has been extremely civil and I think me (and likely others) are looking forward to other posts to read throughout it.
Now THAT, I find offensive. Mine doesn't. You may think it does, but that's just an opinion.and they all stink.
You are correct about the coining of the term, my bad. I was referring to the notion/philosophy of agnosticism, which well pre-dates his speech. My bad, you are right to correct me.Actually, the word agnostic originated in a Thomas Henry Huxley speech to describe his philosophy that rejects all claims of spiritual or mystical knowledge. Basically, without proof, there is not knowledge.
It is not about Christianity or Catholicism.